Organizing Upgrade

A+ A A-
Monday, 01 July 2013 00:00

Snowden's Choice -- and Ours

nsa-earphones 1

WarTimes' Washington's Wars and Occupations:
Month in Review #98 • June , 2013

Nathan Paulsen situates the NSA revelations in the long and sordid history of U.S. government surveillance and likewise puts the Supreme Court's gutting of the Voting Rights Act in context, closing with the challenge this poses to those who abhor injustice.     

When Edward Snowden took responsibility for media leaks that revealed National Security Agency (NSA) surveillance programs, I was viscerally moved. A rare moment of pride in my U.S. citizenship tingled down my spine. In exercising his freedom of speech to blow the whistle on government spying, Snowden acted in the best of our democratic traditions. Awed by the courage of a man willing to impoverish himself and risk years in prison for the common good, I felt challenged by his example.

Not that I have half the daring of Mr. Snowden.

But I do experience, I think, a similar disgust.

It is not the sort of disgust one might encounter when tasting a particularly unpleasant food. Or, say, coming across a maggot-filled squirrel on the side of the road. It's not a distaste for small discomforts, but a repugnance reserved for the great injustice in our world.

Published in War and Militarism

Organziing Upgrade wants to provide a platform for an open discussion about the poltiical and strategic implications of teh recent Supreme Court decision to strike down the Voting Rights Act and the disturbing amendment to the immigration legislation in the Senate.  To join the conversation, you can commetn below or send us your comments and reflections to us at upgrade 

Bill Fletcher, Jr.: Supreme Court guts Voting Rights: not surprised, but sickened

Reposted from Bill's website.

I cannot say that i was surprised. I think that all of the signs were there that the majority of the Supreme Court would move against the 1965 Voting Rights Act. That said, i kept hoping that the Court would leave the Voting Rights Act alone. It did not work out that way.

It is critical that we understand that the attack on the Voting Rights Act is a conservative assault on the 'future.' This larger attack is not so much an undertaking by those who have always hated the Voting Rights Act, though that is, of course, one component. Rather it is an offensive against the changing demographics of the USA and the implications that this raises regarding the potential for a progressive political realignment. The political Right is very aware that the demographics are against them, therefore, gerrymandering plus gutting the Voting Rights Act is an effective approach if one wants to undermine the emergence of a new electoral majority.

Various liberal and progressive commentators have been suggesting that we must demand that Congress takes action. While that sounds reasonable, in some respects, given the balance in Congress it is unlikely that anything will change. What is, perhaps, more interesting is to consider a different side to strategy, that which was raised years ago by the former Congressman Jesse Jackson, Jr., and has subsequently been raised by the on-line group "Color of Change": a Constitutional amendment on voting rights. In other words, there must be a political movement built around expanding democracy–including but not limited to voting rights–rather than simply patching up the current system. This is not to say that liberals and progressives in Congress should not act to reform the Voting Rights Act and deep-six the Supreme Court's ruling. I am hoping that something will be moved immediately. But what we really need to look at is the larger question of democracy and, specifically, the manner in which it continues to be threatened by NSA surveillance, drones, and, yes, the attacks on voting rights. These various issues need to be linked rather than treated separately.

We must keep in mind that since the 1970s there has been a concerted effort in the USA and most other advanced capitalist states, to turn back the clock on civil liberties and democratic rights. The Supreme Court's decision against the Voting Rights Act is only one act in a much longer and mean-spirited drama. The moves towards authoritarianism must be resisted now, not some time in the future.


Harmony Goldberg: The Past and Future Poltiics of Race in the United States

I’m thinking about the relationship between this week’s disturbing developments in the Supreme Court (striking down the Voting Rights Act) and the Senate (the terrible amendments to the pending legislation that might legalize millions of undocumented immigrants). While it’s true that the shameful striking down of the Voting Rights Act effectively rolls us back about forty years back into the past, I think its just as - if not more - important to think about what this says about the future of the politics of race in this country.  I came of age politically in California as the state was becoming majority people of color. But - as that transition was happening - the electorate remained majority white, and those white voters used the electoral process to shore up the structural manifestations of white privilege: eliminating affirmative action and bilingual education, bolstering the prison system and so on. (Or - as I like to describe it - white people lost their damn minds.). As we move towards a majority people of color nation over the next thirty years, I think we will see increasing attempts to disenfranchise communities of color in order to shore up white electoral power as a key mechanism for shoring up other kinds of racial inequities in the face of a people of color majority. These two heartbreaking political developments are a part of that process. We need to start planning ahead for the wave of racialized political attacks that will come from many corners over the next several decades. Things are gonna get real crazy. We’d best get ready to fight.

Published in Community Organizing

Comment via Facebook

Community Organizing News

Organizing Upgrade 2012 / Built by Union Labor